By
Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 4:00 AM on 10th February 2012
The tax break would benefit anyone who hires help for their house, such as a cleaner
Tax breaks for families to employ cleaners, babysitters and gardeners were described as ‘interesting’ by the Prime Minister yesterday.
The scheme, which would be aimed at helping working women with domestic chores, could save households thousands of pounds a year.
But any introduction of it could be politically explosive as it might be portrayed as encouraging the employment of domestic servants.
The tax break would also disproportionately benefit middle and high-income families who can afford hired help.
The Prime Minister said he was ‘very’ interested in the controversial scheme, which is used in Sweden and Finland.
Under the system, domestic helpers claim back tax credits directly from the government and then invoice families for the remaining amount.
The policy was introduced in Finland in 2001 to persuade families to put their cleaners on the books.
The tax break, which is worth up to £3,000, would benefit anyone who employs help around the house. But it is particularly helpful for women, who bear the brunt of housework.
Although it would cost billions to administer, the scheme would also raise revenue for the Treasury from domestic helpers paying tax for the first time.
Gardeners could also be paid for in the government’s new scheme
While attending the Nordic-Baltic summit in Stockholm, the Prime Minister said: ‘What you do in Sweden in terms of tax help and tax relief, not so much on childcare but on other things that help women go out to work, I thought that was a very interesting idea that I want to look at further.’
Labour MP Jessica Morden said: ‘This demonstrates how out of touch David Cameron is about the pressures facing women in this country.
‘He is suggesting tax breaks for people who can afford domestic workers at the same time as he is cutting tax credits for working parents and removing child benefit.
‘Is this what he means when he says we are all in it together?’
A No 10 spokesman said: ‘This summit was an exercise in taking on board and sharing lots of different ideas. That’s very different from saying we are going to adopt them. You can safely say we are not going to be adopting tax breaks for people who take on domestic servants.’
Share this article:
Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
Is the man having a breakdown or something? He certainly appears to live in an alternate reality to the rest of us.
Report abuse
Who would gain most from this MPs on £56K or someone on the minimum wage?
Report abuse
So now we are expected to fund domestic help through loss of our taxes?
Why not support manicures, massages and hairdressing, as I’m sure the well paid employed need support that as well…
Report abuse
I work as a cleaner in peoples homes who are mainly busy working mums none are middle class, i think its a good idea.
Report abuse
What’s wrong with hiring domestic servants, if it benefits both parties?
Report abuse
I think it is a good idea. A chance to get some people off the dole.
£3,000 is not enough to hire a servant, it is enough to hire a cleaner to come in once a week for a half-day.
Report abuse
Why not a tax break for say at home mums?
Report abuse
Tories LibConMen have revised serfdom and feudalism as the rich get massively richer and the poor starve…
Report abuse
It would also put a lot of people in the workforce with little academic ability, or may be students, mums or dads who want flexible working hours. I think it’s a great idea not everyone can be high flyers, and cleaners are paid as much as call centre staff. And there’s nothing wrong with manual work. Someone has to do it!
Report abuse
I work as a cleaner mostly in homes where women with children are working and i think its a great idea. None of them are middle class just really busy.
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.